Skip navigation

community

Alternative Energy Solutions & Technologies

6 Posts tagged with the fuel_cell tag
0

USC fuel cell.gif

USC liberation method (via USC)

 

A problem with hydrogen for use as a fuel comes when the vehicle is in a crash. The hydrogen leaks out, and any sparks or fire will ignite the gas. Another problem is a hydrogen fire is invisible. (I toured a manufacturing facility once where they had hydrogen tanks for use in the factory. They had the "broom test" for testing if there is a hydrogen fire. People would walk down a hallway waiving brooms in front of them to see if the bristles catch fire. It is a scary thought. The same would happen with hydrogen vehicles.)

 

The use of hydrogen as a fuel is still on its way to reality. A common method of making hydrogen safe for transport is placing it into a harmless chemical. One method is a formic-acid storage. Another popular option is ammonia borane, a nitrogen-boron complex.

 

The University of Southern California (USC) has developed a way to extract hydrogen from ammonia borane. They took their research further and devised a way to extract the hydrogen at a rate that is usable as a fuel.  Unlike other boron and metal hydride hydrogen storage and release systems, the USC system is air-stable and re-usable. Read more of their findings at the Journal of the American Chemical Society.

 

You have liberated hydrogen, now you have to safe place to store it, and a great way to use it.

 

Eavesdropper

0

GA.gif

 

I am conflicted. I want this to the future, and I also do not.


 

Ohio University's Geradine Botte, has demonstrated that "the most abundant waste on earth" can produce hydrogen with less than half the energy need with water. “During the electrochemical process the urea gets adsorbed on to the nickel electrod= surface, which passes the electrons needed to break up the molecule,” said Botte. The breakthrough comes in urine's constituent "urea." In which 4 loosely bonded hydrogen atoms are present per molecule. The required energy to break the molecule of Urea is 0.37V, while water needs 1.23V to split.


 

Botte wants to upscale the idea to be used in treating waste water. I wonder if Newcastle University included this sizeable volume of waste water in their calculations.


 

See more at the Royal Society of Chemistry journal Chemical Communications.


 

Eavesdropper

 

 

image via RSC Publishing

0

2-12-11-powertrekk-2.jpg

MyFC's hydrogen fuel cell and battery pack, "PowerTrekk", is packaged to be the backup of choice for all those "off the grid." Although it looks delicate, the Powertrekk is "rugged, waterproof, and robust." Wall chargable, you use the devices battery pack until a point is reached when the fuel-cell kicks in it's instant charging routine for the pack. Geared towards powering mobile devices in the winderness, the Powertrekk has several USB ports."PowerTrekk has a competitive edge over traditional portable chargers. Fuel cell power is generated immediately and charging is not impacted by weather or the position of the sun, as for solar panels. Compared to battery powered travel chargers, PowerTrekk offers reliable charging as the fuel packs do not deplete as batteries do,” said Bjorn Westerholm, CEO at myFC, the company behind PowerTrekk. So far there is no word on the price of the charger but myFC say’s it will be released soon.


Eavesdropper

0

5428475741_5480df791a.jpg

 

A new combination of nanoparticles and graphene results in a more durable catalytic material for fuel cells. The catalytic material is not only hardier but more chemically active as well. The researchers are confident the results will help improve fuel cell design. Chemist, and all-around nice guy, Jun Liu and his colleagues at the Department of Energy's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Princeton University in Princeton, N.J., and Washington State University in Pullman, Wash., combined graphene, a one-atom-thick honeycomb of carbon with handy electrical and structural properties, with metal oxide nanoparticles to stabilize a fuel cell catalyst and make it better available to do its job. The centerpiece of the fuel cell is the chemical catalyst, usually a metal such as platinum, sitting on a support that is often made of carbon. A good supporting material spreads the platinum evenly over its surface to maximize the surface area with which it can attack gas molecules. It is also electrically conductive. Fuel cell developers most commonly use black carbon but platinum atoms tend to clump on such carbon. In addition, water can degrade the carbon away. Another support option is metal oxides (think rust) but what metal oxides make up for in stability and catalyst dispersion, they lose in conductivity and ease of synthesis. As a carbon support, Liu and his colleagues thought graphene intriguing. The honeycomb lattice of graphene is porous, electrically conductive and affords a lot of room for platinum atoms to work. First, the team crystallized nanoparticles of the metal oxide known as indium tin oxide (or ITO) directly onto specially treated graphene. Then they added platinum nanoparticles to the graphene-ITO and tested the materials.


The team viewed the materials under high-resolution microscopes. The images showed that without ITO, platinum atoms clumped up on the graphene surface. But with ITO, the platinum spread out nicely. Those images also showed catalytic platinum wedged between the nanoparticles and the graphene surface, with the nanoparticles partially sitting on the platinum like a paperweight. The team tested how well the new material stands up to repeated usage by artificially aging it. After aging, the tripartite material proved to be three times as durable as the lone catalyst on graphene and twice as durable as on commonly used activated carbon. Corrosion tests revealed that the triple threat was more resistant than the other materials tested as well. The team is now incorporating the platinum-ITO-graphene material into experimental fuel cells to determine how well it works under real world conditions and how long it lasts.



Eavesdropper

0

small-penny-sized-nuclear-battery.jpg

 

While scientists are finding ways to make batteries smaller and even more powerful, problems can arise when these batteries are much larger and heavier than the devices themselves. University of Missouri researchers are developing a nuclear energy source that is smaller, lighter and more efficient. “To provide enough power, we need certain methods with high energy density. The radioisotope battery can provide power density that is six orders of magnitude higher than chemical batteries,” said Jae Kwon, assistant professor of electrical and computer engineering at MU. Kwon and his research team have been working on building a small nuclear battery, currently the size and thickness of a penny, intended to power various micro/nanoelectromechanical systems (M/NEMS). Although nuclear batteries can pose concerns, Kwon said they are safe.  His innovation is not only in the battery’s size, but also in its semiconductor. Kwon’s battery uses a liquid semiconductor rather than a solid semiconductor. “The critical part of using a radioactive battery is that when you harvest the energy, part of the radiation energy can damage the lattice structure of the solid semiconductor. By using a liquid semiconductor, we believe we can minimize that problem,” explained Kwon. For more information please visit: http://ceramics.org/ceramictechtoday/tag/jae-kwon/


Eavesdropper

0

os_dmfc05.jpg

The concept came about in 2004 from collaboration between the KDDI Corp. and Toshiba to utilize a better way of powering our mobile phones. Later on at 2009’s Ceatec show held in Japan, the concept was unveiled in a prototype created by both companies. The phone ran off of a prototype methanol fuel cell and included a lithium ion battery to help the unit deal with surges in energy use. The battery was optimized to offer users 320 hours of power, a significant increase over current standard battery capacities. The main benefit of such a power source is that the methanol can instantly be refilled rather than waiting for a power outlet to gradually recharge the cell phone. The fuel cell itself was gargantuan in proportion, almost as big as the phone, which is probably why it was scrapped. The cell was supposed to be out for consumers to buy in April or September of 2009 and apparently died a quiet death in the ‘good idea, bad visualization’ cemetery of conceptual technology. If anyone has heard what actually happened to this or if it was just put on ‘the back burner’ somewhere, post a reply because this still seems like an interesting idea that should have been engineered better.


Eavesdropper