Skip navigation

community

0

Video standards are changing, moving from analog video to digital video. Digital Video Interface, or DVI, was developed by the Digital Display Working Group (DDWG) to replace the VGA connector standard, the "legacy analog technology." [1]

 

There are some very simple differences between analog and digital video, and simple advantages to switching to digital.

 

Analog signals travel in a sine-like wave form, and digital signals travel in a square-like waveform. Digital signals offer advantages over analog because the wave shape offers multiple places to read the signal and is more accurate. Digital signals are also far less vulnerable to EMI and RFI interference, especially when fiber cable is used to transmit the signals.

 

As a result, systems and KVM switches are moving from HD15 or VGA connectors to DVI connectors. The DVI connectors can either support both analog or digital signals depending on the pinning. DVI-I supports both analog and digital signals while DVI-D only supports digital.

 

Standard resolutions with analog video initially were designed to only 640 x 480 or 800 x 600. They were later stretched to higher resolutions, but the image quality became dependent on many physical factors of the transmission link, and hence more vulnerable to distortion and signal degradation. Upgrading to digital video brings higher resolutions, usually about 1920 x 1200. Using dual-link video effectively doubles the power of transmission and provides an increase in speed and signal quality. Dual-link video resolutions can display resolutions of 2048 x 1536 or even 2560 x 1600. This resolution is supported on high-definition displays, such as 30" LCD monitors and digital signage displays.

 

DVI-D extenders reach up to 460 feet over CATx cable and up to 40 km over single-mode fiber. These distances will improve as the technology for extending signals improves.

 

Black Box offers a number of products for digital video extension, including ServSwitch™ DKM switches and extenders the ServSwitch Agility, and the ServSwitch Wizard Dual-Link DVI.

 

Sources:

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital%E2%80%93visual_interface

0

Earlier this year, the CCCA (Communications Cable and Connectivity Association) commissioned a white paper after it tested cables from offshore manufacturers and found that many failed to comply with fire safety specifications. It found that many of the cables are made from low-fire performing materials making them highly combustible. This means trouble for contractors.

 

The paper was commissioned from the law firm of Crowell Moring to look at potential liability for contractors who install communications cables that do not comply with NEC (National Electrical Code) requirements.

 

In the white paper, Crowell Moring studied the laws in Connecticut, Virginia, and Florida.  Because each state incorporates NEC into its building codes, a violation of those codes is a state violation. Crowell Moring explains, “Any installed cable that fails to meet the NEC standards, whether known, apparent, or not, opens a contractor up to penalties for those failures.”

 

The paper concludes that contractors who install CMR or CMP cable may face liability based on violations of building codes. If a contractor installs non-compliant cable that causes damage, such as a fire, the contractor can also be held liable in civil lawsuits.

 

The paper states that "A contractor need not have actual knowledge that the cable is non-compliant to be found negligent. If a contractor knew it installed non-compliant cable, but said it was compliant, the contractor can be charged with fraud. And lastly, if a contractor installs non-compliant cable, either knowingly or unknowingly, the contractor is liable for breach of contract and warranty claims.”

 

As a contractor you may face exposure to legal liability. The white paper says you can avoid this liability by carefully, “selecting, purchasing, and installing cable that complies with NEC standards.”  In addition to the white paper, information on non-compliant cables and best practices for purchasing compliant cables can be found at the CCCA website.

0

One of the hottest topics during the past year has been the legal wrangling over counterfeit cable. Last year, Anixter sued Commodity Cables, Inc. The suit alleges that Commodity Cables sold substandard off-shore-manufactured cable that did not meet flame- and fire-resistance standards established by UL® and the National Fire Protection Association. Some of the cable in question was marked as being UL® certified or ETL Verified. Anixter is seeking $1 million in damages plus punitive damages for false advertising, unfair competition, breach of contact, and deceptive trade practices.

 

The basis of the suit stems from when Anixter said it discovered numerous boxes of cable with apparently fraudulent UL marks. Anixter sent the cables to UL for burn testing, which they failed. In December 2010, Anixter recalled all its Commodity Cables products from customers. Anixter has also worked with many customers to remove and replace the substandard cable.

 

In June 2011, Commodity Cables countersued Anixter. The counterclaim is a defamation allegation.

 

More information on the history of the suits can be found at Cabling, Installation & Maintenance. Or, read more about how to avoid unsafe, unapproved, or counterfeit cable.

0

Here at Inside the Box, we’re always trying to find stellar content and industry news. One of the hottest topics in the cabling industry today is the prevalence of counterfeit cable. In a nutshell, counterfeit cable is imported cable marked and advertised as compliant to North American fire codes and industry standards, but it's not—even though the cable may carry UL® and ETL marks. The subject is extremely serious because of public safety and liability issues about fire and network performance. In addition, there are also legal and cost issues related to contractor liability.

 

Today, we want to share the presentation given at the September 2011 BICSI conference by the CCCA (Communications Cable & Connectivity Association). The presentation, titled Non-Compliant Cabling Products: How Big Is the Problem and What Can be Done?, focuses on codes and standards in the cabling industry, as well as what your risks are when installing non-compliant cable.

 

Founded in 2007, the CCCA is a non-profit association committed to ensuring all cabling products in North America comply with existing codes and standards. The association is growing, and members include many of the industry's top cabling manufacturers.

 

The CCCA has also done other studies on counterfeit and substandard cables. The results point to the importance of purchasing cable from known sources (such as us!). You can also check verified cable directories on the UL® and ETL websites. Look for authentic marks and labels on the cable, too. For example, in October 2010, UL® started requiring the use of holographic labels on cable.

 

For more studies and presentations by the CCCA, check out their blog.

1

A common vulnerability in wireless networks is in their ability to create unexpected connections that can result in security gaps. Here are five common wireless security bandits to watch out for:

 

1.   The rogue access point (AP). A rogue access point is an unauthorized access point connected to your wired network, generally connected by someone in your organization trying to set up do-it-yourself wireless service. Although rogue access points are usually installed innocently enough, they can provide an unsecured gateway right into the heart of your network.

 

2.   The ad-hoc client. Ad-hoc mode is the ability of wireless devices to connect directly with other wireless devices without accessing an access point. If a computer on your wired network sets up an ad-hoc wireless connection to another computer, that other computer can gain access to your network through the ad-hoc computer.

 

3.   The out-of-compliance access point. Older access points that have not been updated to the latest firmware release may open your network to hackers. Keeping all the equipment on your network up to date with firmware releases will protect your network from attack to known vulnerabilities. Not doing this can weaken security and reduce network performance. Out-of-compliance access points tend to be a problem in organizations that do not have a security policy that addresses keeping all equipment up to date on their firmware releases.

 

4. The mis-associated client. This is a problem, not with your wireless network, but with nearby wireless networks. When a wireless client has more than one wireless network to choose from, it may accidentally connect to the wrong network. This kind of mis-association, especially if it’s by a laptop also connected to your wired network, creates a security breach. Although mis-association is usually accidental, a hacker may deliberately create a decoy wireless network that looks like yours in order to fool users into logging on. This connection then allows the hacker to steal passwords and attack your wired network.

 

5. The non-traditional wireless device. It’s easy to focus on laptop computers and forget about other wireless clients such as personal Bluetooth® devices, cell phones, bar-code readers, and printers that may also use your wireless network. All these devices are vulnerable to cracking and may present an entry to your network to an enterprising hacker.

 

Your best defense against these common security bandits is a cohesive security strategy that includes network access control, regular site surveys, and a consistent, up-to-date security policy. A centrally managed wireless system makes planning and enforcing network security far more efficient than in “traditional” wireless networks with autonomous access points. Managed systems can often be set to independently handle tasks such as network access control and rogue mitigation, making life far easier for time-stressed IT managers.

1

Industrial environments have much harsher conditions than those found in typical office environments. Not only do they often have extremes of temperatures and humidity, plus dirt and corrosive materials, they may also contain devices such as motors and mechanical switches, which cause a large amount of electromagnetic interference (EMI).

 

The challenge with industrial controls and network components, as well as with other electronic devices intended for use in harsh environments is to have them function reliably in spite of adverse conditions.

 

There is a distinct set of features that makes industrial devices different from components intended for office or data center use. These features are:

 

1. Extended temperature range. Temperature tolerances from -25 to +60° C (-13 to 140° F) are common and you can even find devices rated for extremes to -40 to +75° C (-40 to +167° F).

 

2. Resistance to moisture and contaminants. Industrial components are housed in hardened cases that are sealed against contaminants including particulates such as airborne dust, as well as moisture and sometimes chemicals. Some extreme environments may require devices with conformal coating, which is a special film or coating applied to electronic circuitry to provide additional protection.

 

3. Specialized power supplies. Because of the great variation in power available at industrial sites, industrial components are usually sold separately from their power supply. You need to choose the correct power supply to match both the type of power input from the power grid and the output expected by the powered device.

 

4. DIN rail and panel mounting. Industrial network components and their power supplies are often mounted on a DIN rail—an industry-standard metal rail, or they’re panel mounted by using tabs on the unit. Both DIN rail and panel-mount units are usually attached to a wall or bulkhead.

 

5. EMI protection. Because they’re often installed near motors or other electrically noisy machinery, devices for industrial applications are shielded to withstand higher EMI than those intended for office or data center use.