<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Development Tools and Solutions</title>
    <link>http://www.element14.com/community/groups/development-tools/blog</link>
    <description>Comment Feed for Development Tools and Solutions</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 20:46:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <generator>Jive SBS 4.5.7.1 (http://jivesoftware.com/products/clearspace/)</generator>
    <dc:date>2011-03-03T20:46:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Real-time Audio Spectrum Analyzer using a PIC 8-bit microcontroller</title>
      <link>http://www.element14.com/community/groups/development-tools/blog/2011/01/11/real-time-audio-spectrum-analyzer-using-a-pic-8-bit-microcontroller#comment-5111</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:64235798-46cc-4173-aa02-5739894a3e40] --&gt;&lt;div class="jive-rendered-content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Impressive project!&amp;#160; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm trying to hash out issues with real-time audio processing tasks on an Arduino without even having to worry about a nice display like that.&amp;#160; Although, looking at his PIC code, I see the 8-bitter is running at 48MHz - pretty zippy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cheers,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Drew&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:64235798-46cc-4173-aa02-5739894a3e40] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 20:46:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>messages@element14.com</author>
      <guid>http://www.element14.com/community/groups/development-tools/blog/2011/01/11/real-time-audio-spectrum-analyzer-using-a-pic-8-bit-microcontroller#comment-5111</guid>
      <dc:date>2011-03-03T20:46:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Real-time Audio Spectrum Analyzer using a PIC 8-bit microcontroller</title>
      <link>http://www.element14.com/community/groups/development-tools/blog/2011/01/11/real-time-audio-spectrum-analyzer-using-a-pic-8-bit-microcontroller#comment-5126</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:a2036209-5fa2-45f4-bca3-bb021d823950] --&gt;&lt;div class="jive-rendered-content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nice job!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:a2036209-5fa2-45f4-bca3-bb021d823950] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 20:37:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>messages@element14.com</author>
      <guid>http://www.element14.com/community/groups/development-tools/blog/2011/01/11/real-time-audio-spectrum-analyzer-using-a-pic-8-bit-microcontroller#comment-5126</guid>
      <dc:date>2011-03-03T20:37:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Microstick from Microchip</title>
      <link>http://www.element14.com/community/groups/development-tools/blog/2010/07/27/microstick-from-microchip#comment-4612</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:9cba1bed-70f0-43b0-8c48-1710523f4d62] --&gt;&lt;div class="jive-rendered-content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is a nice board indeed! But I can't understand why is it so limited to support only two parts?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;Supported Parts&lt;/strong&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.microchip.com/wwwproducts/Devices.aspx?dDocName=en532314" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;dsPIC33FJ64MC802&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;a class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.microchip.com/wwwproducts/Devices.aspx?dDocName=en534556" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;PIC24HJ64GP502&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:9cba1bed-70f0-43b0-8c48-1710523f4d62] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 12:46:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>messages@element14.com</author>
      <guid>http://www.element14.com/community/groups/development-tools/blog/2010/07/27/microstick-from-microchip#comment-4612</guid>
      <dc:date>2011-02-02T12:46:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;STM32 value line Discovery board</title>
      <link>http://www.element14.com/community/groups/development-tools/blog/2010/09/16/stm32-value-line-discovery-board#comment-3236</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:e807947d-114c-47b9-a59b-dbd2ff63cd95] --&gt;&lt;div class="jive-rendered-content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would love to try it, but our product manager is hiding all the samples &lt;img height="16px" src="http://files1.element14.com/community/4.5.7.5/images/emoticons/wink.gif" width="16px"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I do agree with John's thoughts regarding&amp;#160; open source developement and hobbyists. The main stumbling block out there for this kind of dev kit is its use of SWD as opposed to full J-Tag until either OpenOCD or other such projects manage to implement SWD.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:e807947d-114c-47b9-a59b-dbd2ff63cd95] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:33:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>messages@element14.com</author>
      <guid>http://www.element14.com/community/groups/development-tools/blog/2010/09/16/stm32-value-line-discovery-board#comment-3236</guid>
      <dc:date>2010-09-21T11:33:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;STM32 value line Discovery board</title>
      <link>http://www.element14.com/community/groups/development-tools/blog/2010/09/16/stm32-value-line-discovery-board#comment-3235</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:4c16a68e-556d-4618-a3bb-fd4eb7869f1e] --&gt;&lt;div class="jive-rendered-content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;It does look like a good board, especially at that price. The choice of IDEs for it is an improvement compared to the last board they released. This is however still the one thing that puts me off, the available IDEs are all still windows only. For a board aimed at beginners and essentially hobbyists, it isn't that friendly. Not everyone runs windows and products like this may as well be putting off a reasonable corner of the market. Sure there may be around this limit, but are beginners really going to spend the time trying to get it working? These companies are missing out here, but thats just my opinion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for useability, the packages are good. The explanations of the standard code example is good, but could be improved for some of the other features. As you would expect for a low cost product, the support is essentially limited to the FAQs, manual and a forum. Good if you have previous experience with this kind of platform, anyone else may have a hard time. At least, thats what I thought from my experience with the STM8 Discovery.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Over all, a good cheap platform, however some improvements could be made for the beginners market and the IDE side.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:4c16a68e-556d-4618-a3bb-fd4eb7869f1e] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:04:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>messages@element14.com</author>
      <guid>http://www.element14.com/community/groups/development-tools/blog/2010/09/16/stm32-value-line-discovery-board#comment-3235</guid>
      <dc:date>2010-09-20T16:04:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;FTDI replaces DB9 RS232 connectors with DB9-USB-RS232 modules</title>
      <link>http://www.element14.com/community/groups/development-tools/blog/2010/07/29/ftdi-replaces-db9-rs232-connectors-with-db9-usb-rs232-modules#comment-2927</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:47db9a83-ef0a-4477-a248-ddeda3880ae5] --&gt;&lt;div class="jive-rendered-content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;These units would make a nice RoadTest ... I'd definitely like to try one of these out!&amp;#160; &lt;img height="16px" src="http://files1.element14.com/community/4.5.7.5/images/emoticons/wink.gif" width="16px"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It looks like they cost around $27.75 US Dollars ... not a cheap solution -- but could find a use in migrating older boards to newer connectivity (without having to re-design an existing board).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here is the link to the datasheet:&amp;#160; &lt;a class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.ftdichip.com/Documents/DataSheets/Modules/DS_DB9-USB-RS232.pdf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.ftdichip.com/Documents/DataSheets/Modules/DS_DB9-USB-RS232.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gregory&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:47db9a83-ef0a-4477-a248-ddeda3880ae5] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:03:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>messages@element14.com</author>
      <guid>http://www.element14.com/community/groups/development-tools/blog/2010/07/29/ftdi-replaces-db9-rs232-connectors-with-db9-usb-rs232-modules#comment-2927</guid>
      <dc:date>2010-07-30T02:03:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>


