Load Google Translate Hello, new poster here
I'm the Quality Manager at a smallish engineering company that builds industrial control panels, among other things. We have a customer that is encouraging us to become RoHS compliant, so we are going to make sure our shop is empty of non-compliant inventory. The Element14 website is really helpful as I go through our shelves, clearing out stuff that can't stay.
But when it comes to labels, I am at a loss. For example, Brady part number (101519) an Arc Flash label that we use frequently, is listed as N/A when it comes to RoHS. What is the justification for this? When I go to the Brady site and search for that part #, it comes up as "evaluation in progress". So is RoHS applicable to this or not? I can't find anything in the Regulation one way or the other. This is important to us as we use a lot of labels. Please help!
I also have a question on how manufacturers can have aone part that is compliant, and another part that can only be used in conjunction with the first part, that is exempt. Another time.
Thanks in advance for your assistance
Kevin
Kevin
Quite simply labels need to be RoHS Compliant when attached to equipment that falls within the scope of RoHS.
Brady is aware of this, and has been for several years, so maybe an admin error on their part.
I would call them.
Best wishes
Gary
Mr. Thimpson,
RoHS does not require any specific labelling.
Depending on your location, abiding by the RoHS restrictions is also up to the individual company. The EU demands compliancy. In the USA only California has laws that restrict use of certain non-RoHS products. But that will soon spread to other states.
An alternative symbol you may want to consider that will cover all grounds in the EU, is the WEEE symbol.
Cabe
Yes indeed.
I wish I had a $ for every time I was asked if there was an official RoHS label, which there is not.
Interestingly we did encourage a major label maker to issue a RoHS C-of-C for a WEEE label back
in 2006 or so.
Thanks for the comment but it wan't what I was asking.
I am interested in finding out if the labels themselves need to be compliant, and based on Gary's answer, it appears that they do.
Has anyone ever heard of a label or sticker that was not RoHS compliant?
Hi Kevin,
I am in agreement with Gary in that it is my understanding that labels that are attached to product that falls within the scope of the legislation have in them selves to comply with the legislation.
We considered labels to be high risk items. This stance was primarily based upon the pigments, lead and chromates used in the inks in particular the red, yellow and oranges and the pantones that may use a combination of these inks or pigments.
In the case of subcontracted labels we always establish and specify the ink to be used in terms of the ink manufacturer from whom we have obtained the necessary documentation which in the case of high risk colours is supported by external testing. To date we have not found a non compliant ink such that our confidence in particular suppliers allows us to reduce our testing requirements and accept statements of compliance from particular manufacturers at face value.
With proprietary labels you may have an unknown supply chain. For example it may come from your distributor, but who is supplying them this week, and from what continent, and what type of specification / controls are in place? As such there is deemed to be a greater element of risk which may only be reduced by the use of external testing.
Have we had any failures to-date? No but it is the perceived risk that forms the current strategy which will be modified when sufficient evidence has been accumulated to support an increase or reduction in testing when dealing with a particular supply chain.
This is our selected course in the absence of specific direction from the policing bodies and reflects the level of due diligence expected from a company of our size. However it has been indicated that the smaller the company the lower the amount of due diligence is expected. That said will your customer measure your success by the degree of due diligence you can demonstrate or the amount of rejected product he has had to recover from the market place due to a non-compliant label, cable, finish on a fastener or dot of red paint. But that’s another story..........
© 2009 Premier Farnell plc. All Rights Reserved
Premier Farnell plc, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE