Load Google Translate Don't forget to sign up for email notifications under the "Actions" box so you'll see when Jon answers your question.
Jon Levin
Jon studied physics at Purdue University before pursuing a career in electronics. He is now a sales engineer at Star Micronics America with expertise on technical aspects related to the design and implementation of audio components.
If not already, you'll need to or ![]()
to ask your question. Otherwise, click reply below. |
Hi Jon: Thank you for the response to my question. I'll try to better define the problem that I am trying to remedy. All hearing aid (HA) have a basic inherent deficiency in that they leave the user saying "I hear you but I don't understand what you are saying". I know the cause of this deficiency and I believe that I have a fix for it. The fix is comparatively straight forward and does not involve such things as amplification or audio frequency shifting. It uses a new type of modulation, which I choose to name as "serial modulation" I am far along enough so that I need to demonstrate my fix. For this I need the output of an A to D Converter, which as I understand is nothing more than a set of numbers defining the magnitude of the input signal, at some high rate, for examples, 8,000 hertz and at 255 bit resolution. This I wish to then modify to obtain a better and more understandable audio output. The modification would use an EEPROM to accept the input from the AtoD converter and in turn provide a modified signal output. The microphone that you described goes part of the way in that it seems to provide my necessary digital output numbers which then I would modify using the EEPROM to a new set of numbers for final amplification, then output to a D to A converter and to an ear- piece or speaker. Hope this defines my problem better and that you can help out with your insight as to what equipment is needed and is available. Any andall insights are greatly appreciated. Glad you are a physics major and that because of it hopefully this all makes sense to you. What does the audio processor that you refer to do? Is it something like a Digital Signal Processor?
Thanks, Nate Almond
Nate, when I mentioned the audio processor I was referring to the audio codecs. I believe that they often have the ability to encorporate sound processing. Here is an example from NXP (http://www.nxp.com/#/pip/pip=[pip=UDA1355H]|pp=[t=pip,i=UDA1355H]|). I would reccomend speaking with them or another chip manufacturer about your application and they can tell you how to add signal processing.
Hi Jon, Can you suggest any ways of generating a triangle wave of up to 1mhz ? I have tried using the OP AMP idea which generates a squarewave and triangle wave, though even after trying a expensive high speed op amp, the trangle wave is distorted at the low and high limits. I can't find anything else and are thinking of programming in a pic chip and using a DAC to generate the wave now, do you have any other suggestions before I un-forget my ASM days ? Thanks, Chris
Hi Chris. My experience is more in acoustics rather that circuitry but I've discussed your question with some of my colleagues. Can you describe the distortion you are seeing at the high and low limits? If there are flat edges on the top and bottom of the triangle wave, then the gain of the second op amp is too high. The gain is set by (R1/R2) - See attached circuit diagram. If you are seeing some other type of distortion there may be some issue with the switching and you may need to talk with the op amp manufacturer to fix the issue. Using Op-Amps are the only way that we are aware of to create a triangle-wave although a DAC would work as well. Hopefully this helps.
Hi Jon,
Thanks for your reply. The circuit is pretty much the same. Though I am running a single rail so there is a 2.5V bias (running from 5V rail)
The only audio device which seems to work is the LM6172IMX LM6172IMX. I tried a bunch from TI and only one of them worked, but a lot worse than the LM device. I was trying to use a rail to rail op amp so the voltage started from zero to 5volts, though the waveform actually is about 1volt to 4volts p-p. Useable range is only about 2-3volts which is bad from a 5V rail.
The LM6172IMX LM6172IMX is about as fast a op amp as I can find. I don't know why the slower ones do not work at all. I am only running about 1mhz so most of these op amps shouldn't have a problem, though the ones from TI do not do anything at all, just a flate line on the scope, so not sure whats going on..
Sorry this is not an actual reply. I would like to mod my boss DR-5 so that without the use of its midi function I can trigger the sounds by way of keyboard keys. In addition to this I would like to add external speakers and a 16-24 track recorder that will be able to record my performances. Is this possible?
Hi Jon!
I'm looking for an audio spectrum analysis IC to interface with a uController. I like the MSGEQ7 but it is not readily available from any standard suppliers. After consulting with a few manufacturers, they have told me that something like MSGEQ7 isn't being built anymore and I would have to go with some sort of configurable DSP device.
I need something that is still in production and I am trying to avoid another programmable chip in my design. (After prototyping, connecting to and programming a device is cumbersome)
Do you know of any product that I can drop in place with minimal external components and audio spectrum data back? I basically need something with a series of notch filters or a limited FFT onboard.
Thanks!
- Mike
Hi, is the RMS on this actually 350W, or is it an error on the site? http://uk.farnell.com/jsp/displayProduct.jsp?sku=1149117&CMP=e-2072-00001000&gross_price=true
It just seams too good to be true.
Alex
© 2009 Premier Farnell plc. All Rights Reserved
Premier Farnell plc, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE