Load Google Translate I seen that the PS3 has been cracked by a 20 year old hacker Geohot, to allow it to run a full Linux install and customize.
He has also cracked the iPhone to allow use on different networks
Is the guy a genius, or a criminal?
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/25/playstation_cracked_wide_open/
Here is the link to the original article.
In my view, I am a bit split between both hero and villain. Sony are notorious for very strict protection systems, some which are quite laughable (like the CD protection that only needed a black marker round the outside of the disk) and some quite serious; the time they installed a rootkit onto CDS which self installed on PCs leaving them open to vulnerabilities. Also the company is notorious for locking down systems and preventing any user mods. So in those respects I'm glad to see the "little guy" get one over the big corp.
On the other hand, it opens the system up to use hacked games, which is not good news for the games industry. As a fan of games, I know how much time and money they take to produce, and know that this crack will likely affect my favourite developers.
Is access to the hypervisor really that much of an accomplishment when the earlier PS3's would allow any correctly written PPC binaries to be run?
Sony upset a lot of people by disabling the PS2 functionality, and a few more by removing alternate OS support, but they've not considered it a great enough threat to remove it from the menus in later firmware. Hacking alternate OS support back in via the hypervisor would please those universities that didn't buy enough old models in time, though!
The fact he's announced that he is looking for, with intent to publish, the encryption keys certainly is criminal.
You have to split this up two parts.
When I buy a PS3 I'm free to smash it against the wall and throw it away. I could take the power supply out and use it for other purposes. Or I could format it and install another OS.
I bought a VAIO. And I wanted to buy a VAIO, not Windows ! But I couldn't buy a VAIO without Windows. I can imagine why.
SONY doesn't want customers to mess around with their products and when it is not working as expected, go pointing at them.
So I completely formatted my HD, hidden sectors included, to install a Linux distribution. It's MY computer. And the Windows software is not messed around with, it is "trashed"
Things get different when you start messing around in the software that is on your computer. Because, you don't buy the Windows software. You buy a licence to use it for a limited period of time ! Meaning this software remains the property of Microsoft. And they do not allow you to mess around with it. Probably for the same reason I described above.
Other companies that are the maker of software applications might use similar licences. We don't consider GPL in this case.
Content is the next step in this. Music, Pictures, Video, Messages, Books ( written or read ), Games, Multimedia.
The publishers / owners of content are huge companies who heavily rely on the makers of software for their products to be viewed / listened to / read, but also not to be copied illegally. It is therefore that they would like everyone to buy a factory installed computer that cannot play a single MP3 file without first buying it. But.
Having a Linux environment installed including all the free tools to do reverse engineering is not breaking any law, modifying programs and / or content in order to copy, spread and use it, is.
Andre
Genius, definitely!
1. Sony have distributed music CDs with root kits. Shows despicable lack of respect for customers, so customers free to return equal amount of respect. Sony defined that rule.
2. For every other product, you pay money, get goods, seller gets profit, you use the product any way wanted. Why should game computer be different? Old paradigm says control.
3. If Sony made system and software open, smart and curious minds see no attractive puzzle... Maybe smart and curious minds would develop good games & Sony profit more by sharing with them like iPhone. New paradigm says share and everybody wins.
Sony will drown in the tar pits with other dinosaurs unless they recognise new profits from new business models. Stand still and your feet will be locked in tar.
New work building on shoulders of great men and women who went before is basis of development of so many fields of science, engineering and medicine. We are unique species - must expand in knowledge or we sour and die selling each other insurance. Ever outwards, into space, there are only limits we set ourselves. When humans cooperate and share we can overcome anything. Focus energy on problems, not controlling each other. Open source show chaotic methods more efficient than old controlling methods.
Cheers, Colin
I agree with you about control. I completely disagree with your Apple comparrison. I think Apple are as bad, if not worse than Sony for protectionist behaviour, although the company has never gone to the physical depths that Sony has, especially the rootkit example. I think both companies are similar in other ways, valuing brand and perception over functiolality or performance, so maybe there is a reason for their deterrmination to control access?
Cracking the hardware security is only the beginning, the xbox 360 has been "cracked" for a number of years now and has only recently seen an increase in availability of libraries and utilitys to enable any meaningful homebrew code to be written.
Unfortunately software to enable piracy is relatively easy to develop with access to the hypervisor, and is almost always one of the first things to appear on any "scene".
The PS3 is an interesting case as Sony have actively supported development of Linux systems and software on their hardware since the PS2 was initially released, the biggest bone of contention within the community has always been that they have kept the interesting stuff for themselves, such as access to full hardware acceleration for the Gpu and unrestricted processor access.
The cynical amongst us might be tempted to say that this is deliberate attempt by Sony to incite "hackers" to break the security and enable software piracy as sales figures have been poor for the PS3 especially in comparison to the xbox. I would personally like to believe that the release of the slimline version, which removes the ability to boot alternative operating systems is more of a motivating factor.
I do not own a PS3 however I do own a number of xbox 360's and they make excellent linux clusters (with uprated heatsinks and cooling solutions)
with a performance that is difficult to match at the same price point.
When we purchase hardware we are not agreeing to use it as the manufacturer intended, however people that experiment with hardware in this manner must be willing to accept the risks. Would a white goods manufacturer take umbrage at you using thier top of the line refrigerator to hold solder paste? How would you feel if that white goods manufacturer took steps to make your refrigerator useless if it detected the presence of solder paste within it? This is how Microsoft appear to be treating their customers at the moment, lets hope Sony don't go down the same route.
© 2009 Premier Farnell plc. All Rights Reserved
Premier Farnell plc, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE