Skip navigation

community

5752 Views 3 Replies Latest reply: Sep 12, 2010 3:04 AM by Gordon Margulieux RSS
Gordon Margulieux Level 3 62 posts since
Jun 30, 2009
Currently Being Moderated

Mar 29, 2010 6:45 PM

Early Review: Atmel - AVR Xplain Evaluation Kit

NOTE:  I’m still working on my taxes, so I can only give a brief comment at this time.  A more detail evaluation will follow in a couple of weeks.

Last week I was pleasantly surprised to find in my mailbox a small package from Element-14. In the package was the Atmel AVR Xplain, Xmega Evaluation Kit, with a 8 bit, low power MCU and 128KB programmable flash memory.

As mentioned above, I have been busy trying to complete a very important task, at least to my Uncle Sam and my wife. Both whom I would like to keep very happy. But aside from this, curiosity got the best of me as I opened the package. If the package had not been marked “Farnell” and I didn’t remember the kit being mentioned in the RoadTest group, I wouldn’t have known it was from Element-14, since there was no paperwork with it. 

The kit is a mix of an evaluation (limited programmability) and demo (not expandable) board. It is not a development kit, but in all fairness, doesn't claim to be.  There is a JTAG header to connect an external programmer/debugger.  The board also includes a USB accessible bootloader that can program the unit through the AVR Studio programmer IDE. But none of this is known until you go online, because no documentation comes with the kit. Instead a box label states for “environmental reasons” no CD or paper documentation is included (see picture) then points you to their main website, http://www.atmel.com/avr. This website is not very direct, but another box label leads you to a more helpful site, http://www.ateml.com/xplain that contains a user guide (attached doc8203.pdf) and a zip file (attached AVR1907.zip) with more than enough design details for the board (schematic, source code, etc.).  There is much more information at the website, but it is not very well organized.

When I get a little more time, I will update this post.  I look forward to evaluating this kit in more depth soon.

Note_P1040021.JPGBOX_P1040011.JPG Box_Open_P1040016.JPG

Brd_P1040013.JPG

Alistair, thank you again for the opportunity to try something new!

Regards,

Gordon Margulieux

Salem, OR, USA

Attributes

  • I recently got introduced to Atmel through a Qtouch seminar that a distributor was offering. The equipment used was this kit, plus a QTouch XPlained add-on board to illustrate capacative touch - very nice btw. I also won (in a raffle) a QT600 kit which was being given away at the end of the seminar. Later on I was also given a XPlain, QTXplain, AVR Dragon and lent an STK600.

     

    I figured, wow, with all this kit theres no way I can't get ALL my projects done.  From having no experience w/atmel I went to having six different MCU's and several touch panels. Since the current project I'm working - and probably all future ones - is wireless I purchased an RZ600 to top it off. At first glance there seemed to be a large amount of documentation, app notes and source code. Once I began looking at all of it - for the last month and a half - the docs began to look more vague and the source code was poorly documented. I went to avrfreaks to see if there was anything to fill in the gaps - there is some - but it seems that quite regularly ppl post there and they get hardly more than "RTFM" and "go check google". Sometimes it's well deserved, but it gives the forum the feel that the ppl there just dont wanna be bothered with anything less than expert questions. With such vagueness in alot of the literature entry-level questions are bound to appear.

     

    So, after all this time slogging through App Notes and Data Sheets I have obtained a basic competence with these MCU's and am writing a program to control the radio registers and functions with an STK600/Xmega128a1 and an XPlain board to comminucate back and forth. I thought it would be much easier with all the supposed documentation available but it doesn't go quite far enough.

     

    Coming from the point of view of using Renesas and TI MCU's I am very disappointed with what ATsmell has available. If I had been using Renesas or TI I probably wouldn't have had to code very much at all and a weeks worth of research, or less, would have gotten me straightened out. Whereas currently I am still not quite sure I know all that I need.

     

    So, at this point with all I've seen I would have to agree w/the 3 out of 5 star rating, although the hardware looks like it is top-notch. If you know exactly how to do it, then this is the way to go, if you don't please RTFM before buying to make sure you can get up to speed.

Related Content


Related Products
Discussions
  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)